01902nas a2200205   4500008004100000245014600041210006900187260000900256300000900265490000600274520113300280653001501413653003201428100002001460700001701480700001801497700002201515700001701537856014201554       2009                        eng d00aBusiness Education and Its Relationship to Student Personal Moral Philosophies and Attitudes Toward Profits: An Empirical Response to Critics0 aBusiness Education and Its Relationship to Student Personal Mora  c2009  a9-240 v83 aCritics of business education (e.g., Ghoshal, 2005; Mitroff, 2004) place much of the blame for recent ethical scandals on the lack of moral development of managers and the amoral, "profits-first" theoretical underpinnings of business education. To empirically test these claims, we surveyed 1,080 business and nonbusiness students from a major research university. The results suggest that neither the personal moral philosophies of business and nonbusiness students, nor the personal moral philosophies of business freshmen and business seniors differed significantly. Based on our results, we found no evidence to support the claims of critics who suggest business education is associated with negative personal moral philosophies of students. Further, the attitudes of business freshmen and business seniors concerning profit and sustainability differed significantly, yet in the direction opposite the one Ghoshal (2005) and others would have predicted. Thus, blaming the rash of ethical scandals on the amoral and "profits-first" theoretical underpinnings of business school training might be too simplistic of an approach.10aManagement10aStrategy & Entrepreneurship1 aNeubaum, Donald1 aPagell, Mark1 aDrexler, John1 aRyan, Fran, McKee1 aLarson, Erik  uhttps://stage.business.oregonstate.edu/biblio/business-education-and-its-relationship-student-personal-moral-philosophies-and-attitudes-0